Should I Still Hire a Personal Injury Attorney?Posted by Maria on Dec 30, 2015 in Personal Injury | 0 comments
In this day and age, people want things done swiftly. This is an age that is growing more and more impatient by the day as there are an increasing number of ways in order to get instant gratification. While some of these processes certainly make things faster, that doesn’t mean that they are better. In fact, there are some institutions that often take advantage of this mindset in order to get the best deal for themselves and withhold just retribution towards the innocent.
Take, for example, the case between the relationship of insurance companies and plaintiffs in personal injury cases. If a plaintiff doesn’t have an attorney during a situation that can constitute as personal injury, they may be advised by representatives from the defendant’s insurance company to accept a payout and to just pretend that the whole thing never happened. This can be tempting as it involves the gratification of getting paid but it also removes the potential complications and hardships that legal process could mean.
According to the website of the Law Office of Charles D. Hankey, insurance companies know that it is statistically more likely for victims to receive higher monetary settlements if they are represented by an attorney than if they proceed with the situation without one.
This is because a victim – or the surviving kin of the victim, such as in circumstances surrounding wrongful death – may not know how to navigate their way around a situation like this. They may accept financial compensation that is not sufficient to meet all of the damage that the injury has done. They may thought of repairs or medical expenses but the cost of the loss of wages as well as the potential emotional trauma that was caused by the injury could not have been taken into consideration.